The final exam is a proctor-secured written essay worth 25% of your final grade.
To comply with the Ontario Ministry of Education guidelines for secure, authentic assessment, you will prepare your arguments and outline beforehand, and then draft your essay live on camera.
Your final task is to write a comprehensive synthesis essay on the following topic:
Select a major issue facing young people today (e.g., academic integrity in the age of AI, job market instability, digital misinformation, mental health/overthinking, or the pressure to perform public identities).
Assess how the tools and insights you learned throughout this course, including both technical/analytical tools (such as ethical AI prompting or research synthesis) and psychological/philosophical approaches from characters (such as Macbeth's ambition, moral decay, or psychological guilt), can help us frame and navigate this challenge.
To support your thesis, your essay should:
Before you begin your live writing session, you should prepare your ideas.
You may use Large Language Models (LLMs) during this phase to brainstorm ideas, refine your thesis statement, or critique your outline structure.
Your preparation document must include:
Note: Your preparation document should contain notes, outlines, and quotes, but no full paragraphs or pre-written blocks of text. You must write the actual sentences of your essay from scratch during the proctored session.
Deliverable:
Submit your preparation notes and outline Google Doc before starting the live writing video.
Once your preparation document is ready, you will complete the secure live writing session.
To comply with Ontario Ministry requirements, you must write your essay under secure conditions. For this exam, you will use our Secure Exam Workspace portal, which you can access via the Enter Secure Proctor Workspace button in the submission section of this page.
The proctoring system uses an external recording camera (such as your smartphone set up on a tripod, stand, or shelf) alongside our secure in-app editor subdomain. This verifies that you are the one drafting the work in real-time without relying on intrusive desktop monitoring software.
Writing Integrity & Copy-Pasting: Because pasting is disabled, you must draft your sentences live. The system continuously syncs your typing cadence and timestamps with the teacher's dashboard. Any sudden blocks of text or copy-paste attempts will be logged and may result in an academic integrity audit or a follow-up oral interview (viva-voce) to verify ownership.
registrar@asyncacademy.ca, and paste the link. Once the permissions verification check succeeds, finalize your submission!Deliverables:
Submit your final essay directly inside the secure exam workspace portal. (Confirm with your instructor that your final draft is synced.)
Upload the continuous 3/4 angle video recording of your writing session to Google Drive, share it with registrar@asyncacademy.ca, and verify the link inside the exam workspace portal to complete your submission.
Before you submit, please complete the Pre-Submission Self-Assessment.
Rough Notes & Outline (Google Doc) prepared before the live writing session.
Proctored Essay Draft written live in the in-app editor.
Proctored Video Recording showing your screen and webcam during the writing session.
We are learning to:
Draft a cohesive, structured academic essay under timed conditions without generative AI assistance
Select and synthesize textual evidence to defend an arguable thesis statement
Apply self-correction strategies to ensure clear syntax and grammatical accuracy
I can:
Formulate a clear, arguable thesis and structured outline beforehand
Write a multi-paragraph academic essay live under proctored conditions
Integrate relevant quotes from Macbeth or your biography case study
Provide a complete proctored video recording verifying your authentic work
| Category | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Level 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge / Understanding
How well does the student demonstrate understanding of the chosen play/biography themes and structures?
|
Demonstrates a thorough, deep, and accurate understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures | Demonstrates a considerable and accurate understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures | Demonstrates some understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures | Demonstrates limited understanding, with frequent inaccuracies or superficial analysis |
|
Thinking / Inquiry
How effectively does the student construct a persuasive argument and support their thesis statement under timed conditions?
|
Thesis is highly sophisticated, and arguments are exceptionally logical, well-defended, and cohesive | Thesis is clear, and arguments are logical, well-defended, and cohesive | Thesis is basic, and arguments are generally logical with some inconsistencies or gaps | Thesis is unclear, and arguments are weak, disjointed, or lack support |
|
Application
How effectively does the student integrate textual evidence (quotes) and adhere to the proctoring protocols?
|
Integrates evidence seamlessly and follows all proctoring/recording guidelines flawlessly | Integrates evidence effectively and follows proctoring/recording guidelines | Integrates evidence with uneven effectiveness and follows most proctoring guidelines | Integrates little or no evidence, or fails to adhere to proctoring guidelines |
|
Communication
How clearly, logically, and grammatically does the student express their ideas in the written essay?
|
Expresses ideas with a high degree of clarity, flow, and grammatical precision | Expresses ideas clearly, logically, and with considerable grammatical accuracy | Expresses ideas with some clarity and logic, but has minor grammatical errors | Written communication lacks clarity, organization, or contains frequent errors that impede understanding |
Demonstrates a thorough, deep, and accurate understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures
Demonstrates a considerable and accurate understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures
Demonstrates some understanding of key themes, character arcs, and structures
Demonstrates limited understanding, with frequent inaccuracies or superficial analysis
Thesis is highly sophisticated, and arguments are exceptionally logical, well-defended, and cohesive
Thesis is clear, and arguments are logical, well-defended, and cohesive
Thesis is basic, and arguments are generally logical with some inconsistencies or gaps
Thesis is unclear, and arguments are weak, disjointed, or lack support
Integrates evidence seamlessly and follows all proctoring/recording guidelines flawlessly
Integrates evidence effectively and follows proctoring/recording guidelines
Integrates evidence with uneven effectiveness and follows most proctoring guidelines
Integrates little or no evidence, or fails to adhere to proctoring guidelines
Expresses ideas with a high degree of clarity, flow, and grammatical precision
Expresses ideas clearly, logically, and with considerable grammatical accuracy
Expresses ideas with some clarity and logic, but has minor grammatical errors
Written communication lacks clarity, organization, or contains frequent errors that impede understanding